Comments on: You May Write for the NYT, but You’re a Mom Blogger Too https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/ For three minutes in the 80's, I was awesome. Sat, 16 Mar 2019 19:06:08 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.32 By: Yet Another Rant on the New York Times Mommy Blogger Thing https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/comment-page-1/#comment-8131 Wed, 08 Feb 2017 22:05:44 +0000 http://www.mammaloves.com/?p=555#comment-8131 […] You May Write for the NYT But You’re a Mom Blogger Too […]

]]>
By: Dünyadan blog haberleri at CinChin https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/comment-page-1/#comment-5382 Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:16:42 +0000 http://www.mammaloves.com/?p=555#comment-5382 […] You make write for NYT but you’re a mom blogger too. NYT makes mommy wars even stupider […]

]]>
By: Petit Elefant https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/comment-page-1/#comment-5365 Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:00:33 +0000 http://www.mammaloves.com/?p=555#comment-5365 It’s the selling your sister down the river point I’m having the biggest problem with at this point. I mean, really? Who’s got your back if not your fellow co-workers/bloggers/moms/friends/women?

Thank you for writing this.

]]>
By: Barchbo https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/comment-page-1/#comment-5359 Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:36:16 +0000 http://www.mammaloves.com/?p=555#comment-5359 I am not a mom. I am not a blogger.

When I read the article, I thought: Ibet she doesn’t have very many female friends. Because if you have healthy female relationships, you can portray female relationships (even enmeshed or dysfunctional ones) in a healthy way. I just thought she didn’t really “get it” about women in general – forget blogging or being a mom.

As for big and small: Big are the ones I like. Small are the ones I don’t. You’re big to me, Mammaloves! Always!

]]>
By: Dagmar Bleasdale https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/comment-page-1/#comment-5342 Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:52:13 +0000 http://www.mammaloves.com/?p=555#comment-5342 I keep wondering what the writer was thinking. Did she not realize how her article came across? She is a fellow blogger (I hadn’t heard of her before, though), so why write about moms who blog in such a condescending way?

I just posted my response to the article, and I would love to hear your view on it :) Thanks for your post. My child benefits from my blogging as well.

Best,
Dagmar
Dagmar’s momsense

]]>
By: DiPaola Momma (Lara) https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/comment-page-1/#comment-5338 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:11:14 +0000 http://www.mammaloves.com/?p=555#comment-5338 Really… I mean REALLY! Go to Blog World Expo, attended a cocktail party and it’s a business trip where you are “networking”. Go to an all women conference on the same topics and your facilitator is a “sorority leader” and you’re “sipping mimosas” (which I’m especially offended by because I was there and didn’t get one of those suckers, dam!) outside your mini-van. Use the term “comment tribe” and you’re “girlie” but if you “build your tribe” you’re a freaking genius MAN. Gah.. enough already this SMALL blogger needs help!

]]>
By: Sarah, Goon Squad Sarah https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/comment-page-1/#comment-5337 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:52:57 +0000 http://www.mammaloves.com/?p=555#comment-5337 There is the catch. Who is a “big blogger”? Who is a “Small blogger”? What kind of notoriety are people after? Do the “smaller bloggers” just want name recognition, do they want 15,000 unique pageviews a day, or do they want Intel to sponsor their trip to Greece?

And how would a bigger blogger help them get it?

Are they saying that Dooce owes them a link or the Bloggess should get them a job? Or do they just want to pick the brain of someone who has gained a lesser level of blogging success?

This could be a million different things. I never know where a person falls on the big/small blogger scale, but I know that I try to help people that have questions just because I’ve been doing this for five years. Does that mean I owe somebody something? Or I owe everybody that starts a blog something? Impossible.

]]>
By: TwittLink - Your headlines on Twitter https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/comment-page-1/#comment-5336 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:34:27 +0000 http://www.mammaloves.com/?p=555#comment-5336 […] Tweets about this great post on TwittLink.com […]

]]>
By: Loralee https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/comment-page-1/#comment-5335 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:54:48 +0000 http://www.mammaloves.com/?p=555#comment-5335 Oy.

And Oy.

You said so many things here perfectly.

Me love you long time.

xo

P.S. That “big” “small” terminology of mine has not gone over well. I regret not finding a better way to phrase it for discussion. Oy.

]]>
By: Rock and Roll Mama https://www.mammaloves.com/2010/03/555/comment-page-1/#comment-5334 Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:30:18 +0000 http://www.mammaloves.com/?p=555#comment-5334 Amie-
You’ve never, ever been small in my book. You’ve always been one of my beltway girls, whom I knew shared a wonky strain with my own. And I love you for it. And respect all the many roles you carry more than you know.

We all have finite energy. Given the eight hours a day you spend doing incredible, policy changing work, could you apply those same skills to getting your blog to “rock star jetsetter blog”? Or whatever one would call it.

Of course you could. I have no doubt you can do anything you set your mind to, you brilliant girl. But where your juice is going moves the needle for the greater good. Not the corporate coffer. And I thank you for it, though I also understand feelings of wanting your words and ideas validated through wider recognition. We all want that, and I’m not sure we ever fully have it.

But please know what a light you are in this space. I’m so glad to know you, and that we had that time to chillax in Houston.

]]>